Re: Indirect indexes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: Indirect indexes
Дата
Msg-id CANP8+jLRR9MTU9vJL2VEjKSu=1YaBJKrErTW1C61ewX3qV07iw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Indirect indexes  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 18 October 2016 at 21:41, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:

> Are we
> trading initial performance gains for performance degradation through
> maintenance?

Eh? That's backwards, so No. The whole point of this is it avoids long
term degradation currently caused by non-HOT updates.

Normal UPDATEs that don't change PKs won't generate any changes to
VACUUM away, so only actions that remove PK values will cause anything
to be collected and removed from indexes.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: "Some tests to cover hash_index"
Следующее
От: Claudio Freire
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Indirect indexes