Re: [HACKERS] pg_background contrib module proposal

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: [HACKERS] pg_background contrib module proposal
Дата
Msg-id CANP8+jLHXyDkQ49j6sJR6T5p4Mc7vw5_bJvxAsVii_qnCctinA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] pg_background contrib module proposal  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] pg_background contrib module proposal  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 9 December 2016 at 13:00, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

> That might be good, because then we wouldn't have to maintain two
> copies of the code.

So why are there two things at all? Why is this being worked on as
well as Peter's patch? What will that give us?

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Fetter
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] pg_background contrib module proposal
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_authid.rolpassword format (was Re: [HACKERS] Passwordidentifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol)