Re: computing completion tag is expensive for pgbench -S -M prepared

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: computing completion tag is expensive for pgbench -S -M prepared
Дата
Msg-id CANP8+jL1O--E7B25j_Loy+bjJhAFpZAc4Trp1ZouadW8w5ngqQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: computing completion tag is expensive for pgbench -S -M prepared  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: computing completion tag is expensive for pgbench -S -M prepared  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 7 June 2018 at 11:29, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:

>> Do we actually need the completion tag at all? In most cases??
>
>
> affected rows is taken from this value on protocol level

I didn't mean we should remove the number of rows. Many things rely on that.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: computing completion tag is expensive for pgbench -S -M prepared
Следующее
От: Ashutosh Bapat
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw withpartition wise join enabled.