Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Дата
Msg-id CANP8+jL0ShZoy+XoX=kU-26GK5Bzb5kLxn+w3mfu6uVWuWRhkw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11  (Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 5 April 2018 at 13:18, Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru> wrote:
>> The variable would become unused in non-assert builds. I see that. But
>> simply removing it is not a solution and I don't think the code will compile
>> that way. We should either rewrite that assertion or put it inside a #ifdef
>> ASSERT_CHECKING block or simple remove that assertion because we already
>> check for relkind in parse_merge.c. Will check.
>>
>
> That is noted by Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20180405.181730.125855581.horiguchi.kyotaro%40lab.ntt.co.jp
>
> and his suggestion to use special macro looks better for me:
> -   char        relkind;
> +   char        relkind PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY;

Thanks both, I already fixed that.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Следующее
От: Michael Banck
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgsql: Validate page level checksums in base backups