Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API
Дата
Msg-id CANP8+jL+BXF=7NxBGDAi+cCdgXyL=UvKo111+f2ipZYERLHrUQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 3 January 2017 at 15:50, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Trying to fit recovery targets into one parameter was really not
>> feasible, though I tried.
>
> What was the problem?

There are 5 different parameters that affect the recovery target, 3 of
which are optional. That is much more complex than the two compulsory
parameters suggested when the proposal was made and in my view tips
the balance over the edge into pointlessness. Michael's suggestion for
2 parameters works well for this case.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] What is "index returned tuples in wrong order" forrecheck supposed to guard against?
Следующее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] multivariate statistics (v19)