Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Дата
Msg-id CANP8+jKd1uAa6VomTUDroiYdtAQWOzbx9ntA6GT3+8PbBeWCyQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11  (Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 27 March 2018 at 11:46, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 27 March 2018 at 10:31, Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Fixed in v26.
>
> More comments on v26

In terms of further performance optimization, if there is just one
WHEN AND condition and no unconditional WHEN clauses then we can add
the WHEN AND easily to the join query.

That seems like an easy thing to do for PG11

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Parallel safety of binary_upgrade_create_empty_extension
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions