On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 at 02:04, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>
> On 2020-Nov-17, Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> > As an additional optimization, if we do find a row that needs freezing
> > on a data block, we should simply freeze *all* row versions on the
> > page, not just the ones below the selected cutoff. This is justified
> > since writing the block is the biggest cost and it doesn't make much
> > sense to leave a few rows unfrozen on a block that we are dirtying.
>
> Yeah. We've had earlier proposals to use high and low watermarks: if any
> tuple is past the high watermark, then freeze all tuples that are past
> the low watermark. However this is ancient thinking (prior to
> HEAP_XMIN_FROZEN) and we don't need the low watermark to be different
> from zero, since the original xid is retained anyway.
>
> So +1 for this idea.
Patch to do this attached, for discussion.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/