Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Дата
Msg-id CANP8+jJnjPqtiCqyDkHawcmm-j=3SPYKqdpCrchhy83fnwwSkg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
On 29 June 2015 at 18:40, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
  
I'm in favor of a more robust and sophisticated synch rep.  But not if
nobody not on this mailing list can configure it, and not if even we
don't know what it will do in an actual failure situation.

That's the key point. Editing the config after a failure is a Failure of Best Practice in an HA system.

--
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Yourfriend
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Could be improved point of UPSERT
Следующее
От: Kouhei Kaigai
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ctidscan as an example of custom-scan (Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API)