Re: Why we lost Uber as a user

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: Why we lost Uber as a user
Дата
Msg-id CANP8+jJYJUCr5L_gAkdtjZ_1s3py+GsYS5NoV+mejx=s0YaSWw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Why we lost Uber as a user  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 29 July 2016 at 15:44, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:

> All very hand-wavy, of course, and it'd make sense to make the concept
> work for BRIN before we consider anything else, but it seems like there
> could be a use-case for allowing indexes other than BRIN to be built in
> a way that allows HOT updates to happen, thus eliminating the cost of
> having to update those indexes when the tuple is changed, in many cases.
> Of course, those indexes couldn't be used UNIQUE indexes or used for
> primary keys, and adjusting the parameters to a BRIN index you could
> possibly get a similar index, but this might allow such an index to
> still be usable for index-only scans, which a BRIN index will never be
> able to provide.

This idea is vaguely similar to the concepts I've been working on,
based on earlier work in 2007.

I'm starting a new post for a full discussion.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Way to access LSN (for each transaction) by directly talking to postgres?
Следующее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Lossy Index Tuple Enhancement (LITE)