Re: WAL consistency check facility

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: WAL consistency check facility
Дата
Msg-id CANP8+jJXWQyK0s588rkxLypuceTmzYF9dpNsPUyaCuWDFyyahg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: WAL consistency check facility  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 1 September 2016 at 17:23, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

> The primary audience of this feature is PostgreSQL developers

I have spoken to users who are waiting for this feature to run in
production, which is why I suggested it.

Some people care more about correctness than they do about loss of performance.

Obviously, this would be expensive and those with a super high
performance requirement may not be able to take advantage of this. I'm
sure many people will turn it off once if they hit a performance
issue, but running it in production for the first few months will give
people a very safe feeling.

I think the primary use for an rmgr filter might well be PostgreSQL developers.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: System load consideration before spawning parallel workers
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_basebackup, pg_receivexlog and data durability (was: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions)