Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.
Дата
Msg-id CANP8+jJQ=Nx7uBy5UOPQVbJ+_KmkY67cRjZE3M0wBUC5RMU2DA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.
Список pgsql-hackers
On 25 September 2017 at 22:34, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:

>> > Here is a small patch that skips scanning btree index if no pending
>> > deleted pages exists.
>> > It detects this situation by comparing pages_deleted with pages_free.
>
> It seems to work to prevent needless cleanup scans.

So this leaves us in the situation that

1. Masahiko's patch has unresolved problems
2. Yura's patch works and is useful

Unless there is disagreement on the above, it seems we should apply
Yura's patch (an edited version, perhaps).

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fabien COELHO
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for largerconnection counts
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw super user checks