Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY]

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY]
Дата
Msg-id CANP8+jJLeAfSMRxDFh+XGPBV7EB4+oh1C4y29Swt218LKVixDw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY]  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY]
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 14:56, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
 
I have not reinstated phase numbers; I have Rahila's positive vote for
them.  Do I hear any more votes on this issue?

If there is a specific technical issue, I'd like to understand that more. If it is just a usability preference, then I say we should have numbers.

Numbering is natural for people. If we say "It's currently doing phase XYZ", they will say "Is that the 3rd phase?", we'll say "No, actually the 5th", and then they will say "Why didn't you just number them?"

--
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: git head crash/regression failures
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY]