On 13 April 2017 at 18:47, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> But on second thought, I don't think that reporting NULL as the priority when
> quorum-based sync replication is used is less confusing. When there is async
> standby, we report 0 as its priority when synchronous_standby_names is empty
> or a priority-based sync replication is configured. But with the patch, when
> a quorum-based one is specified, NULL is reported for that.
> Isn't this confusing?
To me, yes, it is confusing.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services