Re: optimizing vacuum truncation scans

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: optimizing vacuum truncation scans
Дата
Msg-id CANP8+j+cRzJHYxThej=k=6MOwdDmMcybVRivYy84EnoLpDACAA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: optimizing vacuum truncation scans  (Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 16 July 2015 at 06:51, Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com> wrote:
 
I marked the patch as ready for committer.

The most recent results seem to indicate that the prefetch isn't worth pursuing, but the vm test is. Can someone repeat the perf tests on something larger so we can see, when/if there is a benefit?

Jeff, can you add detailed comments to explain the theory of operation of these patches? The patches add the code, but don't say why. We will forget, so lets put the detail in there now please. Thanks.

--
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Следующее
От: Ashutosh Bapat
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: postgres_fdw join pushdown (was Re: Custom/Foreign-Join-APIs)