Re: Spurious standby query cancellations

On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On further thought, neither do I.  The attached patch inverts
>> ResolveRecoveryConflictWithLock to be called back from the lmgr code so that
>> is it like ResolveRecoveryConflictWithBufferPin code.  It does not try to
>> cancel the conflicting lock holders from the signal handler, rather it just
>> loops an extra time and cancels the transactions on the next call.
>>
>> It looks like the deadlock detection is adequately handled within normal
>> lmgr code within the back-ends of the other parties to the deadlock, so I
>> didn't do a timeout for deadlock detection purposes.
>

That is how I've done it.