On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 10:34 AM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
It would be a lot clearer if the "buffer usage" line was simply moved down. I think that it should appear after the lines that are specific to the table's indexes -- just before the "avg read rate" line. That way we'd group the buffer usage output with all of the other I/O related output that summarizes the VACUUM operation as a whole.
The last two lines are also "*** usage" -- shouldn't the buffer numbers be next to them?