Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Тема Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
Дата
Msg-id CAN55FZ3BnM+0twT-ZWL8As9oBEte_b+SBU==cz6Hk8JUCM_5Wg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Ответы Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Tue, 2 Sept 2025 at 17:54, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
> Ah, you’re right, but then again,  I’d expect ALL_SGML to be used consistently, but it isn't and I didn't check.
> v3 does that.
> Note that GENERATED_SGML where'te included in these two targets but I think there's no harm in checking them too.
>
> Do we actually care about those? I don't want to add needless cycles anywhere. I note that the meson.build doesn't
appearto have a check target at all, or anything that looks for hard tabs or nbsps.Those checks were added to the
Makefileback in October in commit 5b7da5c261d, but that got missed even though Daniel had mentioned it in the
discussionthread.[1] 

I have been working on running these checks under the Meson build
system. To do this, I converted the checks into a Perl script
(sgml_syntax_check) and ran it against both the Makefile and Meson.
Test's name is 'sgml_syntax_check' in the Meson. One difference I
noticed: I could not find a way in Meson to create a test that does
not run by default. As a result, this syntax test runs every time you
run the 'meson test'. This behaviour differs from Autoconf, but I
think it is acceptable.

Additionally, some of the CI OSes were missing docbook-xml; but it has
now been installed.

I did not create a new thread for that, I can create one if you think
that it would be better.

CI run with the attached patch applied:
https://cirrus-ci.com/build/6610354173640704

--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: