Re: meson and check-tests
| От | Nazir Bilal Yavuz |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: meson and check-tests |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAN55FZ30_JaFDD6sWJMNrgd-bpO0cMR+D5XJqxjxh_j1yDG5vA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: meson and check-tests (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On Tue, 16 Dec 2025 at 23:53, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: > > > On 2025-12-08 Mo 3:12 AM, Bilal Yavuz wrote: > > Hi, > > On Mon, 1 Dec 2025 at 06:33, Ashutosh Bapat > <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 30, 2025 at 11:39 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: > > On 2025-11-27 Th 5:19 AM, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote: > > Hi, > > On Sat, 22 Nov 2025 at 01:16, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: > > Committed > > Here is a small follow-up commit for documenting this feature. > > > This really belongs in the "meson" section. We need to add a new para > there similar to the "make" section para you are trying to amend here. > > > +1. I think we should follow a structure similar to the chapter > "installation from source code" which has a separate section for meson > at the same level as 'make and autoconf'. > > Done in v2. > > Thanks, that's better. But I'm wondering if this section shouldn't be moved to regress.sgml, alongside the equivalent forconfigure style builds, and linked to from here in the same way. > > Maybe that's a topic for another day. Thank you for looking at it! Yes, as I wrote in v1, I had originally expected this section to live under regress.sgml. And, I agree, that is probably a topic for another day -- Regards, Nazir Bilal Yavuz Microsoft
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: