Re: Explicitly enable meson features in CI
От | Nazir Bilal Yavuz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Explicitly enable meson features in CI |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAN55FZ2mBojFyZd9i3S+V5sjEOjboMO36m0H3Vq8t3b7SHpuCQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Explicitly enable meson features in CI (Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On Thu, 10 Jul 2025 at 20:12, Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 2:59 AM Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com> wrote: > > Andres off-list mentioned that if we explicitly enable features for > > *all* of the tasks, then none of the tasks will be testing the auto > > feature option and I agree with Andres. My suggestion is setting > > features to auto for Debian - Meson task. I decided on this because I > > think it is the most checked CI task > > Hehe, that's certainly true for me... > > > so it would be easier to catch if > > one of the features is disabled without anyone noticing. > > Seems reasonable. If we do this, can we rename the job with a "- Meson > Auto" suffix or something, to try to call the difference out > explicitly? I think renaming it would be better but then we have two Linux tasks: - Linux - Debian Bookworm - Autoconf - Linux - Debian Bookworm - Meson Auto For me it looks like 'Meson Auto' can be confused with 'Autoconf'. We can rename it as a 'Meson Auto Feature Detection' but that is a bit longer. Do you have any ideas? If you think 'Meson Auto' is good enough, we can continue with it, too. -- Regards, Nazir Bilal Yavuz Microsoft
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: