Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
От | Nazir Bilal Yavuz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAN55FZ1vrMRRFRX+GUg=VgRuLxXKAta4cmU9TdOTG9azVrhDfg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On Thu, 2 Oct 2025 at 23:16, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> writes: > > I suspect what you're really after here is the functionality of the > > check-tabs and check-nbsp targets. So the new Perl script really just > > has to cover those two and doesn't have to bother with xmllint. And > > then you just call that script as part of the postgres-full.xml target. > > Yeah, that's what I was imagining: replace the xmllint call in > postgres-full.xml with this new script that will also run the > tab/nbsp checks. Does not this mean we can not run the syntax check by itself in the make builds? If I understand correctly, we need to create postgres-full.xml each time we want to run the syntax check, right? I was under the impression that the sgml_syntax_check.pl test would be a lightweight way to do a syntax check, so that we could easily use it by itself or in the CI. -- Regards, Nazir Bilal Yavuz Microsoft
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: