Re: Change prefetch and read strategies to use range in pg_prewarm ... and raise a question about posix_fadvise WILLNEED

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Тема Re: Change prefetch and read strategies to use range in pg_prewarm ... and raise a question about posix_fadvise WILLNEED
Дата
Msg-id CAN55FZ0K-9Du-6cc3Y-m8-mCYXbH8Xrjv812ssqEd1wnNr=WQQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Change prefetch and read strategies to use range in pg_prewarm ... and raise a question about posix_fadvise WILLNEED  ("Andrey M. Borodin" <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi Andrey,

On Sun, 7 Apr 2024 at 08:29, Andrey M. Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 15 Mar 2024, at 17:12, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I did not have the time to check other things you mentioned but I
> > tested the read performance. The table size is 5.5GB, I did 20 runs in
> > total.
>
> Hi Nazir!
>
> Do you plan to review anything else? Or do you think it worth to look at by someone else? Or is the patch Ready for
Committer?If so, please swap CF entry [0] to status accordingly, currently it's "Waiting on Author".
 

Thanks for reminding me! I think this needs review by someone else
(especially the prefetch part) so I changed it to 'Needs review'.

-- 
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Banck
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Exponential backoff for auth_delay
Следующее
От: Pavel Borisov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Table AM Interface Enhancements