Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
От | Nazir Bilal Yavuz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAN55FZ0806U7DboVN-AJQ0Tm=ssZKL8hKAbBp7OvWYT6e4GJ1Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On Mon, 6 Oct 2025 at 11:54, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote: > > On 06.10.25 10:29, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote: > > > > I can work on this but I want to clarify it first. Which one do you prefer: > > > > 1- We won't have any command to do syntax checks (including tab and > > nbsp), these checks will automatically run when we generate docs. > > > > 2- We will have a 'check' target but it will only do tab and nbsp > > checks; xmllint will run only when generating the docs. > > I don't know, people have a lot of individual workflows, and they are > not reading this thread. I still don't know what we are actually trying > to fix here, I just noticed that what was committed is flawed. The problem was meson build doesn't have tab and nbsp checks [1]. We were trying to enable these checks on meson build by moving these checks to the perl script so that we can run this script on both build systems. > I would prefer that b2922562726 be reverted, and then someone start a > new thread with a descriptive change proposal. Sounds good to me. I can create a new thread if it gets reverted. [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7020df24-1d5f-41e5-8948-2e8d5da57935%40dunslane.net -- Regards, Nazir Bilal Yavuz Microsoft
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: