Hi,
> Here is a more detailed review.
Thanks for the feedback, I have incorporated the suggestions
and updated a new version of the patch (v3-0001).
The required documentation changes are also incorporated in
updated patch (v3-0001).
> Interesting approach. This unfortunately has the effect of making that
> test case file look a bit incoherent -- the comment at the top of the
> file isn't really accurate any more, for example, and the plain_format
> flag does more than just cause us to use -Fp; it also causes us NOT to
> use --target server:X. However, that might be something we can figure
> out a way to clean up. Alternatively, we could have a new test case
> file that is structured like
002_algorithm.pl but looping over
> compression methods rather than checksum algorithms, and testing each
> one with --server-compress and -Fp. It might be easier to make that
> look nice (but I'm not 100% sure).
Added a new test case file "
009_extract.pl" to test server compressed plain
format backup (v3-0002).
> I committed the base backup target patch yesterday, and today I
> updated the remaining code in light of Michael Paquier's commit
> 5c649fe153367cdab278738ee4aebbfd158e0546. Here is the resulting patch.
v13 patch does not apply on the latest head, it requires a rebase. I have applied
it on commit dc43fc9b3aa3e0fa9c84faddad6d301813580f88 to validate gzip
decompression patches.
Thanks,
Dipesh