Re: Introduce some randomness to autovacuum

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Nikita Malakhov
Тема Re: Introduce some randomness to autovacuum
Дата
Msg-id CAN-LCVPrwcOAi8syb9C_mLk7uSxrAdK0_xb2XiMZCiKwX=C41g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Introduce some randomness to autovacuum  (wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Introduce some randomness to autovacuum
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
Hi!

I agree it is a good idea to shift the table list. Although vacuuming larger tables first
is a questionable approach because smaller ones could wait a long time to be vacuumed.
It looks like the most obvious and simple way is that the first table to be vacuumed
should not be the first one from the previous iteration.

On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 6:04 PM wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi，I like your idea，It would be even better if the weights could be taken according to the larger tables


--
Regards,
Nikita Malakhov
Postgres Professional
The Russian Postgres Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: