On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 08:12:18PM +0300, Nikita Malakhov wrote: > Hi, > > Currently there is no error in this case, so additional thrown error would > require a new test. > Besides, throwing an error here does not make sense - it is just a check > for a vacuum > permission, I think the right way is to just skip a relation that is not > suitable for vacuum. > Any thoughts or objections?
Could you check if this is consistent between the behavior of VACUUM FULL and CLUSTER ? See also Nathan's patches.