Re: 001_password.pl fails with --without-readline
| От | Soumya S Murali |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: 001_password.pl fails with --without-readline |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAMtXxw9PVPyiHY6y4CxS4L92wDqpOp6DsLpC4sAsqT5WO963xA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: 001_password.pl fails with --without-readline (Oleg Tselebrovskiy <o.tselebrovskiy@postgrespro.ru>) |
| Ответы |
Re: 001_password.pl fails with --without-readline
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 12:53 PM Oleg Tselebrovskiy <o.tselebrovskiy@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > > Thanks for your answer! > > Personally, I can’t think of any more test scenarios that could be > tested here (maybe some versions of readline library on some exotic > OS could break, but that seems a little far fetched), so, if you see > no further problems with the patches, you could change > the commitfest entry status to "Ready for Committer", so we could get > another opinion on patches and, if possible, get them committed. > Thank you for the clarification. The patches seem correct based on the testing I have done so far and for me I did not observe any further issues in both readline and non-readline configurations. Since I am one of the reviewers and not the only one. I consider my review as only one data point and I would feel more comfortable if the patches also receive input from other reviewers who may have more experience with this part of the code or different testing environments. I am happy to add my test results and observations to the CommitFest entry to assist further review. Once others have had a chance to look and review, it would likely be more appropriate to move the entry forward. Regards, Soumya
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: