Re: 001_password.pl fails with --without-readline
| От | Soumya S Murali |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: 001_password.pl fails with --without-readline |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAMtXxw8O26e_GwqSjWmDz46bmnZ85wJnvT9J24Zv8gz=c-D2qQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: 001_password.pl fails with --without-readline (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: 001_password.pl fails with --without-readline
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi all, On Sat, Jan 31, 2026 at 1:43 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Soumya S Murali <soumyamurali.work@gmail.com> writes: > > I too agree that changing the behavior in a back-patch could be risky > > and it makes sense to leave that part out for now while still > > addressing the core test robustness issues. I will follow up once I > > have re-applied the patches and completed testing. > > Since we're reaching the end of the January commitfest, > I went ahead and pushed these patches. There's still time to > revise them if your testing uncovers anything undesirable. Thank you for the update and for pushing the patches. I will continue testing on the committed code in both readline and non-readline configurations and will report back if I notice any unexpected behavior or regressions. Regards, Soumya
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: