Re: [HACKERS] Timeline ID in backup_label file
| От | Craig Ringer |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Timeline ID in backup_label file |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAMsr+YGRwzLT0ax4rDHhsZ2v55od11+506hCnTkFWmgn0TjjQA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | [HACKERS] Timeline ID in backup_label file (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Timeline ID in backup_label file
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 26 October 2017 at 02:50, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Lately, in order to extract some information from a backup_label file
> in python I have found myself doing something like the following to
> get a timeline number (feel free to reuse that code, especially the
> regex pattern):
> pattern = re.compile('^START WAL
> LOCATION:.*([0-9A-F]+\/[0-9A-F]+).*\(file ([0-9A-F]+)\)')
> if pattern.match(backup_lable_line):
> current_lsn = m.group(1)
> current_segment = m.group(2)
> current_tli = str(int(current_segment[:8], 16))
>
> That's more or less similar to what read_backup_label()@xlog.c does
> using sscanf(), still I keep wondering why we need to go through this
> much complication to get the origin timeline number of a base backup,
> information which is IMO as important as the start LSN when working on
> backup methods.
>
> I would find interesting to add at the bottom of the backup_label file
> a new field called "START TIMELINE: %d" to put this information in a
> more understandable shape. Any opinions?
Strong "yes" from me.
-- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: