Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Craig Ringer
Тема Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding
Дата
Msg-id CAMsr+YGJocR5+aik9a8yAac=YSFMJJAPRCCDXjTCfxYFM3W0-g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding  (Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>)
Ответы Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding
Список pgsql-hackers
On 27 February 2016 at 15:29, Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
 
Two reasons:
1. There is no ideal implementation of DTM which will fit all possible needs and be  efficient for all clusters.
2. Even if such implementation exists, still the right way of it integration is Postgres should use kind of TM API.


I've got to say that this is somewhat reminicient of the discussions around in-core pooling, where argument 1 is applied to justify excluding pooling from core/contrib.

I don't have a strong position on whether a DTM should be in core or not as I haven't done enough work in the area. I do think it's interesting to strongly require that a DTM be in core while we also reject things like pooling that are needed by a large proportion of users.

--
 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ExecGather() + nworkers
Следующее
От: Petr Jelinek
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Sequence Access Method WIP