Re: [HACKERS] An isolation test for SERIALIZABLE READ ONLY DEFERRABLE

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Craig Ringer
Тема Re: [HACKERS] An isolation test for SERIALIZABLE READ ONLY DEFERRABLE
Дата
Msg-id CAMsr+YFp_-phv_-92G9ENLeTF35=gq0FRz4auF3S9UMYRUW-Wg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] An isolation test for SERIALIZABLE READ ONLY DEFERRABLE  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] An isolation test for SERIALIZABLE READ ONLY DEFERRABLE  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 16 Jan. 2017 17:09, "Michael Paquier" <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> I also have longer term plans to show the first and third of them
> running with the read-only transaction moved to a standby server.
> Kevin Grittner gave me the idea of multi-server isolation tests when I
> mentioned my WIP SERIALIZABLE DEFERRABLE-on-standbys patch off-list,

Being able to do that with the isolation tester has been mentioned a
coupled of times, particularly from 2ndQ folks who worked in BDR. I
think that it has been actually patched in this sense, so perhaps you
could reuse the work that has been done there.

Yep. See the bdr-pg/REL9_4_STABLE branch of the BDR repo, src/test/isolation .

I think Abhijit submitted a patch to the list too.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Masahiko Sawada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Typo in condition_variable.c
Следующее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Typo in condition_variable.c