Re: [HACKERS] BUG: pg_stat_statements query normalization issues withcombined queries

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Craig Ringer
Тема Re: [HACKERS] BUG: pg_stat_statements query normalization issues withcombined queries
Дата
Msg-id CAMsr+YFj_zKLXhK1RPVcX+vqB+L2cyUx5LhBmuPQKW4_ptP09g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] BUG: pg_stat_statements query normalization issues with combined queries  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] BUG: pg_stat_statements query normalization issues with combined queries  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 26 January 2017 at 21:42, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> One suggestion: it's currently non-obvious that ProcessUtility_hook
>> gets called with the full text of all parts of a multi-statement.
>
> OK, we can improve that ...
>
>>   The same query string may be passed to multiple invocations of ProcessUtility
>>   if a utility statement in turn invokes other utility statements, or if the
>>   user supplied a query string containing multiple semicolon-separated
>>   statements in a single protocol message. It is also possible for the query
>>   text to contain other non-utility-statement text like comments, empty
>>   statements, and plannable statements. Callers that use the queryString
>>   should use pstmt->stmt_location and pstmt->stmt_len to extract the text for
>>   the statement of interest and should guard against re-entrant invocation.
>
> Not sure about the reference to re-entrancy.  It's not especially relevant
> to query texts AFAICS, and wouldn't a utility statement know darn well if
> it was doing something that could end up invoking another instance of
> itself?

The utility statement does, but the hooks don't necessarily. If you fire an

ALTER TABLE ... ADD COLUMN .. ADD COLUMN .. ADD CONSTRAINT ..;

for example.

However, I was wrong to say we must guard against re-entrancy. We
should only enter ProcessUtility once with context ==
PROCESS_UTILITY_QUERY, and that's what hooks should be looking at
rather than keeping track of re-entrant invocations.

So perhaps:


"The same query string may be passed to multiple invocations of
ProcessUtility if a utility statement invokes subcommands (e.g. ALTER
TABLE), in which case context will be set to
PROCESS_UTILITY_SUBCOMMAND, or if the user supplied a query string
containing multiple semicolon-separated statements in a single
protocol message. It is also possible for the query text to contain
other non-utility-statement text like comments, empty  statements, and
plannable statements that don't pass through ProcessUtility. Hooks
that use the queryString should use pstmt->stmt_location and
pstmt->stmt_len to extract the text for the statement of interest and
should pay attention to the context to avoid repeatedly handling the
same query string in subcommands."



-- Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training
&Services
 



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Performance improvement for joins where outer side is unique