Re: [HACKERS] background sessions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Craig Ringer
Тема Re: [HACKERS] background sessions
Дата
Msg-id CAMsr+YFW1MCciTobMvEyaky-nn0WQPLoBndRQujCNCM=vnpn_Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] background sessions  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] background sessions  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers


On 12 Dec. 2016 21:55, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Andrew Borodin <borodin@octonica.com> wrote:
> 1. As far as I can see, we connot use COPY FROM STDIN in bg session?
> Since one of purposes is to orchestrate transactions, may be that
> would be valuable.

A background worker has no client connection, so what would COPY FROM STDIN do?

It doesn't make sense. But a bgworker may well want to supply input to COPY. A COPY FROM CALLBACK of COPY FROM FILEDESC or whatever. 

I have the feeling something like this came up on the logical replication thread. Logical rep needs to efficiently load data via bgworker.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] jsonb problematic operators
Следующее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take