Re: WIP: Failover Slots

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Craig Ringer
Тема Re: WIP: Failover Slots
Дата
Msg-id CAMsr+YFK40C2KqZFEkY4spOC8XLo9+8HZQTvGQH6WPzWxax85Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: WIP: Failover Slots  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: WIP: Failover Slots
Список pgsql-hackers
On 24 February 2016 at 18:02, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
 
I really want to focus on the first patch, timeline following for logical slots. That part is much less invasive and is useful stand-alone. I'll move it to a separate CF entry and post it to a separate thread as I think it needs consideration independently of failover slots.

Just an update on the failover slots status: I've moved timeline following for logical slots into its own patch set and CF entry and added a bunch of tests.


Some perl TAP test framework enhancements were needed for that; they're mostly committed now with a few pending.


Once some final changes are made to the tests for timeline following I'll address the checkpoint issue in failover slots by doing the checkpoint of slots at the start of a checkpoint/restartpoint, while we can still write WAL. Per the comments in CheckPointReplicationSlots it's mostly done in a checkpoint currently for convenience.

Then I'll write some TAP tests for failover slots and submit an updated patch for them, by which time hopefully timeline following for logical slots will be committed.

In other words this patch isn't dead, the foundations are just being rebased out from under it.

--
 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Equivalent of --enable-tap-tests in MSVC scripts
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc