Re: [HACKERS] Faster methods for getting SPI results

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Craig Ringer
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Faster methods for getting SPI results
Дата
Msg-id CAMsr+YEk3R5D512ZmvcRxzkmCcudKDJdc2Z2dq0rUuKEXFRW3g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Faster methods for getting SPI results  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Faster methods for getting SPI results  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Faster methods for getting SPI results  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 28 December 2016 at 09:58, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com> wrote:

> I've looked at this some more, and ITSM that the only way to do this without
> some major surgery is to create a new type of Destination specifically for
> SPI that allows for the execution of an arbitrary C function for each tuple
> to be sent.

That sounds a lot more sensible than the prior proposals. Callback driven.

-- Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] ICU integration
Следующее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: pg_stat_statements query normalization issues withcombined queries