Re: WG: [HACKERS] Packages: Again

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Craig Ringer
Тема Re: WG: [HACKERS] Packages: Again
Дата
Msg-id CAMsr+YEUEbT4VqQutc5R=gGmTu0ADHAXBmvdZq6-LXYfk4KuOg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: WG: [HACKERS] Packages: Again  (Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
On 13 Jan. 2017 19:16, "Thomas Kellerer" <

Which is a bit cumbersome given Oracle's limit on 30 characters for
identifiers - but it still increases maintainability. And one of the
advantages given for packages was the increase in namespace availability
which is much easier with Postgres anyway.

I was wondering where the namespace thing came from. Sure, packagename_funcname I'd cumbersome but it's not exactly hard and we've been doing it in C since forever.

I'd assumed it was an issue in the opposite direction. PG identifiers being too short. But it sounds like instead it's people not realising they can do this.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: pg_stat_statements query normalization issues withcombined queries
Следующее
От: Peter Moser
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types