Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Isaac Morland
Тема Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20?
Дата
Msg-id CAMsGm5fqa=a+vui7kqC-ZOJdrDVy=jBQteqEGmTY9bdVJSnRWg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20?  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 at 14:58, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:
On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 12:32 -0500, Christopher Browne wrote:
> All said, I think there's some merit to avoiding a PostgreSQL 13 release, because
> there's enough superstition out there about the infamous "number 13."

It would make me sad if the project kotowed to superstition like Oracle did.

Agreed. That being said, everybody knows you can't avoid the curse of 13 by re-numbering it - you simply have to avoid the version/floor/day/whatever after 12.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Laurenz Albe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20?
Следующее
От: Julien Rouhaud
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Collation versioning