Re: [HACKERS] Merge join for GiST

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Davis
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Merge join for GiST
Дата
Msg-id CAMp0ubfOZ7u2h_zC7WhUKW19+CzpqT2RcQ6nTzfXiD00UWc3PA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Merge join for GiST  (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Merge join for GiST
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:35 AM, Alexander Korotkov
<a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
>> Do you have a sense of how this might compare with range merge join?
>
>
> If you have GiST indexes over ranges for both sides of join, then this
> method could be used for range join.  Hence, it could be compared with range
> merge join.
> However, particular implementation in pgsphere uses hardcoded datatypes and
> operations.
> Thus, for range join we need either generalized version of GiST-based join
> or special implementation for ranges.

Alexander, Andrew,

How do you think we should proceed? Which projects do you think should
eventually be in core, versus which are fine as extensions?

Regards,    Jeff Davis



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump emits ALTER TABLE ONLY partitioned_table
Следующее
От: Masahiko Sawada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Tab completion support for ALTER SUBSCRIPTION REFRESH PUBLICATION