Re: HashAgg's batching counter starts at 0, but Hash's starts at 1.

Поиск

Список

Период

Сортировка

От	Jeff Davis
Тема	Re: HashAgg's batching counter starts at 0, but Hash's starts at 1.
Дата	1 июля 2020 г. 09:46:02
Msg-id	CAMp0ubcyAe9o4vUYFhi5C0FqvTM3zNgUiOLur7Kgmvg8h93NoQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на	HashAgg's batching counter starts at 0, but Hash's starts at 1. (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
Ответы	Re: HashAgg's batching counter starts at 0, but Hash's starts at 1. (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
Список	pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 30, 2020, 7:04 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:

Does anyone have any objections to that being changed?

That's OK with me. By the way, I'm on vacation and will catch up on these HashAgg threads next week.

Regards,

Jeff Davis

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

От: Amit Langote
Дата: 01 июля 2020 г., 09:30:39
Сообщение: Re: ModifyTable overheads in generic plans

От: Amul Sul
Дата: 01 июля 2020 г., 10:00:29
Сообщение: Cleanup - adjust the code crossing 80-column window limit