Re: [HACKERS] Review: GIN non-intrusive vacuum of posting tree

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Davis
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Review: GIN non-intrusive vacuum of posting tree
Дата
Msg-id CAMp0ubcW9HwuiQRrQRDa=mkWwd4kg04vRjGRki2DUgNLPs_9zQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Review: GIN non-intrusive vacuum of posting tree  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Review: GIN non-intrusive vacuum of posting tree  (Andrew Borodin <borodin@octonica.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 4:25 AM, Andrew Borodin <borodin@octonica.com> wrote:
> One idea I had that might be simpler is to use a two-stage page
> delete. The first stage would remove the link from the parent and mark
> the page deleted, but leave the right link intact and prevent
> recycling. The second stage would follow the chain of right links
> along each level, removing the right links to deleted pages and
> freeing the page to be recycled.

Do you think this approach is viable as a simplification?

Regards,   Jeff Davis



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Corey Huinker
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: [HACKERS] PSQL commands:\quit_if, \quit_unless)
Следующее
От: Masahiko Sawada
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] Variable name typo in launcher.c