Re: Readme of Buffer Management seems to have wrong sentence

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Janes
Тема Re: Readme of Buffer Management seems to have wrong sentence
Дата
Msg-id CAMkU=1zUWt1ytD7RozVbwTMeyatbQeb0HF0Rh30Q0zkFnpWUKw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Readme of Buffer Management seems to have wrong sentence  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>)
Ответы Re: Readme of Buffer Management seems to have wrong sentence  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>)
Re: Readme of Buffer Management seems to have wrong sentence  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com> wrote:
>>>I don't think there is a clear picture yet of what benchmark to use for
> testing changes here.
> I will first try to generate such a scenario(benchmark). I have still not
> thought completely.
> However the idea in my mind is that scenario where buffer list is heavily
> operated upon.
> Operations where shared buffers are much less compare to the data in disk
> and the operations are distributed such that
> they require to access most of the data in disk randomly.

If most buffer reads actually have to read from disk, then that will
so throttle your throughput that you will not be able to make anything
else be relevant.  You need to have shared_buffers be much smaller
than RAM, and have almost all the "disk" data resident in RAM but not
in shared_buffers.

Cheers,

Jeff


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: spgist metapage
Следующее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: incorrect handling of the timeout in pg_receivexlog