On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 9:08 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> > wrote: >> What do you think about the patch attached? > > Looks OK. Should it mention specifically "On a hot standby" rather than "On > a standby"? Otherwise people might be left confused on how they are > supposed to do this on a generic standby. It is the kind of thing which is > obvious once you know it, but confusing the first time you encounter it.