Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Janes
Тема Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem
Дата
Msg-id CAMkU=1yzdOCFaYT80CTNuWuZJEjojr7eO9e_jtyKo6aP_UakFA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:

On 10/17/2013 08:55 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

I still think my previous proposal of increasing the defaults for
work_mem and maintenance_work_mem by 4X would serve many more
people well than it would serve poorly.  I haven't heard anyone
disagree with that notion.  Does anyone disagree?  Should we do
it?

I think that it makes sense to do that.  Those are still reasonable
defaults for a machine with 2GB of RAM, maybe even with less.
We're talking about putting this only in a release that will come
out in 2014.  How many machines used for a database server that new
will have less than that?

A lot. A whole lot, more than what most people have in production with more than that. You are forgetting a very large segment of the population who run... VMs.

Why don't we just have 3 default config files:

2GB memory
4GB memory
8GB memory

But what would go in each of those files?  Once we agree on what would be in them, why not just have a continuous knob that does that same thing?

Would your suggestion for the 2GB file have work_mem be at least 4 MB?

Cheers,

Jeff

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] pg_sleep(interval)
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] pg_sleep(interval)