Re: [HACKERS] 10RC1 crash testing MultiXact oddity

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Janes
Тема Re: [HACKERS] 10RC1 crash testing MultiXact oddity
Дата
Msg-id CAMkU=1yW=BRJUaGMg64N4e5QkJv=u-hQXo6om85qQjFFtwnoLA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] 10RC1 crash testing MultiXact oddity  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] 10RC1 crash testing MultiXact oddity  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
Jeff Janes wrote:
> I am running some crash recovery testing against 10rc1 by injecting torn
> page writes, using a test case which generates a lot of multixact, some
> naturally by doing a lot fk updates, but most artificially by calling
> the pg_burn_multixact function from one of the attached patches.

Is this new in pg10, or do you also see it in 9.6?

It turns out it is not new in pg10.  I spotted in the log file only by accident while looking for something else.  Now that I am looking for it, I do see it in 9.6 as well.

Cheers,

Jeff

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Julien Rouhaud
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Make the optimiser aware of partitions ordering
Следующее
От: Ashutosh Sharma
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Page Scan Mode in Hash Index