Process title for autovac

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Janes
Тема Process title for autovac
Дата
Msg-id CAMkU=1yFQ6mCLJuCHUV1NQz7-rH=ZUg2uxvWSpL64ggxo2Q21Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Process title for autovac
Re: Process title for autovac
Re: Process title for autovac
Re: Process title for autovac
Список pgsql-hackers
I've often wanted to know what the autovacuum worker was doing.  The process title seems like the best place to get this information, but the process title tells me what database it is in, but not what table it is working on.

The attached patch demonstrates the concept of what I want.  I put the code in table_recheck_autovac not because I think that is the best location, but just because it was the easiest point at which I knew how to get the table name easily before classTup gets destroyed.

Example output:

  PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
16392 jjanes    20   0  229m  19m 6948 S  3.6  1.0   0:06.85 postgres: autovacuum worker process   jjanes.public.pgbench_accounts


I never reset the process title back to the initial state of just having a database name and no table.  Which I can get away with temporarily because the autovac worker never dilly-dallies between tables, it either goes to the next one, or exits.  A real implementation would probably want to reset it anyway, though.

Is this functionality something we want?  If so should it include explicit vacuum as well as autovac?  Any opinion about where in the code base it properly belongs (which obviously depends on whether it should cover manual vacuum as well)?  And does the string need to distinguish between an autovac and an autoanalyze?
 
Cheers,

Jeff
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: PROPOSAL: tracking aggregated numbers from pg_stat_database
Следующее
От: Joe Conway
Дата:
Сообщение: pg_dump with postgis extension dumps rules separately