Re: data-checksums

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Janes
Тема Re: data-checksums
Дата
Msg-id CAMkU=1y=ioKs+cy_WRCNvh-4a3fVvM0ZiVa6jjbySQbXLKL1iQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: data-checksums  ("Rakesh Kumar" <rakeshkumar464@mail.com>)
Ответы Hi i like to unscribe me, sorry for the incovenient.  (Moises Lima dos Anjos <mozart08@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 12:58 PM, Rakesh Kumar <rakeshkumar464@mail.com> wrote:

> That said, imv anyway, the performance hit is small and having checksums
> is well worth it.

I also would like to believe that the hit is small, but when PG official document writes "noticeable performance penalty", it becomes difficult to convince management that the hit is small :-)


Why ask us questions if you won't believe our answers?

Noticeable means it probably isn't important for most real-world cases, but if you work at it you can probably detect it.

Cheers,

Jeff

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Rakesh Kumar"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: data-checksums
Следующее
От: Agnar Renolen
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Getting started with first user.