Re: BUG #8192: On very large tables the concurrent update with vacuum lag the hot_standby replica

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Janes
Тема Re: BUG #8192: On very large tables the concurrent update with vacuum lag the hot_standby replica
Дата
Msg-id CAMkU=1xxuQM2D18AKhGyfFWP4s2B9cdjbNORzA-3pqTtYpu7mA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #8192: On very large tables the concurrent update with vacuum lag the hot_standby replica  (Federico Campoli <federico@brandwatch.com>)
Ответы Re: BUG #8192: On very large tables the concurrent update with vacuum lag the hot_standby replica  (Federico Campoli <federico@brandwatch.com>)
Список pgsql-bugs
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Federico Campoli <federico@brandwatch.com>wrote:

>
> This is the gprof output for the profile.
>

This looks to me like the gprof of a process that is either idle, or
completely IO bound.

I'd probably approach this with a combination of "strace -T -ttt -p <PID>"
and "lsof -p <PID>" on the PID of the start-up process, to see which file
descriptors it is waiting for read or writes on, and what the underlying
names of the files for those file descriptors are.

Cheers,

Jeff

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeff Janes
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #8192: On very large tables the concurrent update with vacuum lag the hot_standby replica
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #8215: pg_dump includes table out of order in SQL dump