operator family changes, sinval bug?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Janes
Тема operator family changes, sinval bug?
Дата
Msg-id CAMkU=1xx1_Rj24xjQcqHo-Gjk0rh_XaocWAW=br=My-Ac=3X-A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: operator family changes, sinval bug?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-bugs
When I drop the optional triconsistent support function for a gin index
operator family, the system continues to use the function to support index
queries anyway, until I close the session and restart it, at which point it
reverts to using the binary consistent function.

Is this a bug in the cache invalidation mechanism?  Or am I just expecting
too much of it?

On one occasion, I got a
ERROR:  cache lookup failed for function 16442
when trying to do the query using the gin index, but usually it just
continues to work as expected even though it is invoking a function which
no longer exists.

I see the same behavior in both 9.4.4 and in HEAD.

Cheers,

Jeff



alter operator family gin_foobar_ops using gin drop function 6 (text,text);
drop function gin_foobar_triconsistent ( internal, smallint, text, integer,
internal, internal, internal) ;

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: brsaweda@gmail.com
Дата:
Сообщение: BUG #13469: Systematic typo in dblink documentation
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: windows 8 RTM compatibility issue (could not reserve shared memory region for child)