Re: Possible performance regression with pg_dump of a large number of relations

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Janes
Тема Re: Possible performance regression with pg_dump of a large number of relations
Дата
Msg-id CAMkU=1x7hhZrY5yL9ZdvOoETJN5=3WKNCPD37q+s0wnmAfVKRA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Possible performance regression with pg_dump of a large number ofrelations  (Luke Cowell <lcowell@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Possible performance regression with pg_dump of a large number of relations
Re: Possible performance regression with pg_dump of a large number ofrelations
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 5:26 PM, Luke Cowell <lcowell@gmail.com> wrote:
I've been troubleshooting an issue with slow pg_dump times on postgres 9.6.6. I believe something changed between 9.5.10 and 9.6.6 that has made dumps significantly slower for databases with a large number of relations. I posted this in irc and someone suggested that I should post this here. I'm sorry if this isn't the right place.

To simulate the issue I generated 150,000 relations spread across 1000 schemas (this roughly reflects my production setup).

```ruby
File.write "many_relations.sql", (150000 / 150).times.flat_map {|n|
  [
   "create schema s_#{n};",
   150.times.map do |t|
     "create table s_#{n}.test_#{t} (id int);"
   end
   ]
}.join("\n")
```

I have 2 identical pieces of hardware. I've installed 9.5 on one and 9.6 on the other. I've run the same generated piece of sql in a fresh database on both systems.

On my 9.5.10 system:
> time pg_dump -n s_10 testing > /dev/null
real    0m5.492s
user    0m1.424s
sys     0m0.184s

On my 9.6.6 system:
> time pg_dump -n s_10 testing > /dev/null
real    0m27.342s
user    0m1.748s
sys     0m0.248s

I don't get quite as large a regression as you do, from 6s to 19s.  It looks like there are multiple of them, but the biggest is caused by:

commit 5d589993cad212f7d556d52cc1e42fe18f65b057
Author: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Date:   Fri May 6 14:06:50 2016 -0400

    pg_dump performance and other fixes

That commit covered a few different things, and I don't what improvement it mentions is the one that motivated this, but the key change was to add this query:

EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM pg_attribute at LEFT JOIN pg_init_privs pip ON(c.oid = pip.objoid AND pip.classoid = (SELECT oid FROM pg_class WHERE relname = 'pg_class') AND pip.objsubid = at.attnum)WHERE at.attrelid = c.oid AND at.attnum>0 and ((SELECT count(acl) FROM (SELECT unnest(coalesce(at.attacl,acldefault('c',c.relowner))) AS acl EXCEPT SELECT unnest(coalesce(pip.initprivs,acldefault('c',c.relowner)))) as foo) >1 OR (SELECT count(acl) FROM (SELECT unnest(coalesce(pip.initprivs,acldefault('c',c.relowner))) AS acl EXCEPT SELECT unnest(coalesce(at.attacl,acldefault('c',c.relowner)))) as foo) >0))AS changed_acl

Considering it runs 2 subqueries for every column (including the 6 hidden system columns) of every table, even ones that don't end up getting dumped out, it is no wonder it is slow.

If you were just dumping the database with 150,000 objects, I wouldn't worry about a 20 second regression.  But I assume you intend to loop over every schema and dump each individually?
 
Cheers,

Jeff

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Teodor Sigaev
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] PoC: custom signal handler for extensions
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Changing WAL Header to reduce contention during ReserveXLogInsertLocation()