Re: [PERFORM]

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Janes
Тема Re: [PERFORM]
Дата
Msg-id CAMkU=1x2+kW2KMon7Y7wzK0b0KpxFfdN0SuPODJ6KmHbE6saeQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [PERFORM]  (Yevhenii Kurtov <yevhenii.kurtov@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [PERFORM]  (Yevhenii Kurtov <yevhenii.kurtov@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Yevhenii Kurtov <yevhenii.kurtov@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,

We have a query that is run almost each second and it's very important to squeeze every other ms out of it. The query is: 

SELECT c0."id" FROM "campaign_jobs" AS c0
WHERE (((c0."status" = $1) AND NOT (c0."id" = ANY($2))))
OR ((c0."status" = $3) AND (c0."failed_at" > $4))
OR ((c0."status" = $5) AND (c0."started_at" < $6))
ORDER BY c0."priority" DESC, c0."times_failed"
LIMIT $7
FOR UPDATE SKIP LOCKED


 

I see that query still went through the Seq Scan instead of Index Scan. Is it due to poorly crafted index or because of query structure? Is it possible to make this query faster?

An index on (priority desc, times_failed) should speed this up massively.  Might want to include status at the end as well. However, your example data is not terribly realistic.

What version of PostgreSQL are you using?

Cheers,

Jeff

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PERFORM]
Следующее
От: Yevhenii Kurtov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PERFORM]