Re: pg_rewarm status

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Janes
Тема Re: pg_rewarm status
Дата
Msg-id CAMkU=1wViFurANxj7x9VwXVJiRwJqRbdyzB7GZE1YSS3c3Y=xw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_rewarm status  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

Yeah, absolutely.  The first backend that needs a prefetch probably
isn't going to get it in time.  I think that's OK though.  Once the
background process is started, response times will be quicker...
although possibly still not quick enough.  We'd need to benchmark this
to determine how quickly the background process can actually service
requests.  Does anybody have a good self-contained test case that
showcases the benefits of prefetching?

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Cédric Villemain
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_rewarm status
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: preserving forensic information when we freeze